[Genealib] Discontinued Access to Ancestry.com Databases - Follow-up

[Joy Rich]

This was posted on today's Genealogy Blog at
http://genealogyblog.com/ancestrycom/another-side-of-the-ancestrycom-removal-from-the-family-history-centers-5877 .

Joy

Joy Rich
Chapter Representative, New York Metro Chapter
Association of Professional Genealogists
http://www.apgen.org
http://www.apgen.org/chapters/newyork/index.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Another Side of the Ancestry.com Removal From the Family History Centers

> EMail This Post < | by Leland Meitzler | > permalink | 3/17/2007 |

Yesterday I posted the announcement about the removal of "free" Ancestry.com from the
Family History Centers. I've now received a copy of communication written by The
Generations Network CEO Tim Sullivan, to Ancestry employees. Keep in mind that there are
two sides to every issue - so I think it's fair to make this post.

Although I personally don't profit in the slightest from the success of Ancestry.com, I am
big supporter of what they do for the genealogical community. I believe that although
their product isn't inexpensive, it's a tremendous value for any genealogist. Their
continual addition of new digital data (case in point - The Iowa State
Censuses!) - as well as indexes makes a real difference to genealogists. That said, you
can see that I'm probably a tiny bit prejudice. I know that sometimes coming to agreements
that work for all parties is hard - if not impossible.

Mr. Sullivan's letter follows:

  From: Tim Sullivan
  Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 4:38 PM
  To: FYI ALL
  Subject: Update

<non-FHC reference snipped>

I also wanted to share a few thoughts with all
of you on another topic. For the last seven years,
our company has provided free access to
Ancestry.com inside the family history centers of
the LDS Church. During this time, we've done this
without any formal agreement or compensation.
Several months ago, we informed the Church of our
desire to craft a formal relationship that would
allow us to continue providing this free access.
This is similar to the way that we license
Ancestry.com to over 1400 public libraries in the
U.S. and U.K. We do this for a license fee which
lets patrons of these institutions use our service
for free inside their facilities. As you can
imagine, this is a very popular program among
libraries.

  Unfortunately, we were not able to come to
agreement with the Church on the terms of this
proposed relationship. We are disappointed by
this, as we know that patrons of family history
centers value Ancestry.com, and we think our
institutional licensing program is priced very
fairly. We remain willing and eager to have
Ancestry.com available in family history centers,
and we are even hopeful that at some point the
Church will reconsider their position and decide
to give patrons of their family history centers
access to the world's greatest online resource for
family history research.

  We will continue to provide access in family
history centers to a small number of databases
which are covered by other agreements, and none of
our other many agreements with the Church are
impacted by this change. We continue to have a
number of mutually beneficial agreements and
relationships with the Church, and as two large
players in the family history space, we share a
common goal of getting as many people as we can
interested in their family history. Our
relationship is a good one, and we are always
looking for ways to cooperate with the Church in
order to grow our business and ignite more
interest in the category. I'm sharing all of this
with all of you because I am sure that there will
be some unhappy patrons of family history centers,
and I wanted everyone to understand that this was
not a one-way decision on our part.

  Finally, I am constantly asked whether we think
of the Church as a competitor. The answer to this
really depends on the underlying assumptions of
the question. Are we competing for dollars? No. Do
we have exactly the same goals? No. Are we
unfriendly? Absolutely not. Is TGN committed to
making sure that Ancestry.com remains the #1
resource for online family history? Absolutely. Is
Ancestry going to continue to be the home of the
world's largest online family tree? Yup. Should we
be able to innovate faster than anyone on the
planet in this space? Of course. Are we two large
players that each have done tremendous things to
help people understand their family history? Yes.
Can we continue to cooperate with the Church to
get millions more people interested in family
history? We can, and we will.

  I think we have a pretty good game plan for
continuing to grow a truly great company.

  Thanks,

  Tim